![]() |
|
| Home | | |
|
2011-2012 Influenza Season Week 10 ending March 10, 2012 xxxx Publish Date : 3/16/2012 12:29:00 PM Source : CDC
2011-2012 Influenza Season Week 10 ending March 10, 2012All data are preliminary and may change as more reports are received. Synopsis:During week 10 (March 4-10, 2012), influenza activity remained elevated in some areas of the United States, but influenza-like-illness continued to be relatively low nationally.
*HHS regions (Region 1 CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT; Region 2: NJ, NY, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands; Region 3: DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV; Region 4: AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, SC, TN; Region 5: IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI; Region 6: AR, LA, NM, OK, TX; Region 7: IA, KS, MO, NE; Region 8: CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY; Region 9: AZ, CA, Guam, HI, NV; and Region 10: AK, ID, OR, WA). U.S. Virologic Surveillance:WHO and NREVSS collaborating laboratories located in all 50 states report to CDC the number of respiratory specimens tested for influenza and the number positive by influenza type and subtype. The results of tests performed during the current week are summarized in the table below.
The timing of influenza activity and the predominant virus can vary by region and even between states within the same region. Nationally, seasonal influenza A (H3) viruses have predominated since the start of the 2011-2012 season and continue to remain overwhelmingly predominant in Regions 5 and 7. While seasonal influenza A (H3) viruses remain predominant in the majority of regions, the overall proportion of 2009 H1N1 viruses is increasing nationally and in several regions. ![]() View National and Regional Level Graphs and Data | View Chart Data | View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation Antigenic Characterization:CDC has antigenically characterized 626 influenza viruses [127 2009 H1N1 viruses, 410 influenza A (H3N2) viruses, and 89 influenza B viruses] collected by U.S. laboratories since October 1, 2011. 2009 H1N1 [127]
Influenza A (H3N2) [410]
Influenza B (B/Victoria/02/87 and B/Yamagata/16/88 lineages) [89]:
Only a small number of influenza B viruses from the United States have been available for testing so far this season. While less than 50% of these viruses are similar to the influenza B component in the 2011-2012 influenza vaccine, the majority of influenza B viruses circulating worldwide have been similar to the influenza vaccine strain. Composition of the 2012-2013 Influenza Vaccine:The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended vaccine viruses for the 2012-2013 Northern Hemisphere trivalent influenza vaccine, and FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) has made recommendations for the composition of the 2012-2013 U.S. influenza vaccine. Both agencies recommend that the vaccine contain A/California/7/2009-like (2009 H1N1), A/Victoria/361/2011-like (H3N2), and B/Wisconsin/1/2010-like (B/Yamagata lineage) viruses. This recommendation changes the influenza A (H3N2) and influenza B virus components of the 2011-2012 Northern Hemisphere vaccine formulation. This recommendation was based on surveillance data related to epidemiology and antigenic characteristics, serological responses to 2011-2012 trivalent seasonal vaccines, and the availability of candidate strains and reagents. Antiviral Resistance:Testing of 2009 influenza A (H1N1), influenza A (H3N2), and influenza B virus isolates for resistance to neuraminidase inhibitors (oseltamivir and zanamivir) is performed at CDC using a functional assay. Additional 2009 influenza A (H1N1) clinical samples are tested for a single mutation in the neuraminidase of the virus known to confer oseltamivir resistance (H275Y). The data summarized below combine the results of both testing methods. These samples are routinely obtained for surveillance purposes rather than for diagnostic testing of patients suspected to be infected with antiviral resistant virus. High levels of resistance to the adamantanes (amantadine and rimantadine) persist among 2009 influenza A (H1N1) and A (H3N2) viruses (the adamantanes are not effective against influenza B viruses). As a result of the sustained high levels of resistance, data from adamantane resistance testing are not presented in the table below.
Rare sporadic cases of oseltamivir resistant 2009 H1N1 and influenza A (H3N2) viruses have been detected worldwide. Antiviral treatment with oseltamivir or zanamivir is recommended as early as possible for patients with confirmed or suspected influenza who have severe, complicated, or progressive illness; who require hospitalization; or who are at greater risk for influenza-related complications. Additional information on recommendations for treatment and chemoprophylaxis of influenza virus infection with antiviral agents is available at (http://www.cdc.gov/flu/antivirals/index.htm). Pneumonia and Influenza (P&I) Mortality Surveillance:During week 10, 7.3% of all deaths reported through the 122-Cities Mortality Reporting System were due to P&I. This percentage was below the epidemic threshold of 7.9% for week 10. ![]() View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation Influenza-Associated Pediatric Mortality:No influenza-associated pediatric deaths were reported to CDC during week 10. Five influenza-associated pediatric deaths have been reported during the 2011-2012 season. ![]() View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation Influenza-Associated Hospitalizations:The Influenza Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET) conducts population-based surveillance for laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations in children younger than 18 years of age (since the 2003-2004 influenza season) and adults (since the 2005-2006 influenza season). The FluSurv-NET covers more than 80 counties in the 10 Emerging Infections Program (EIP) states (CA, CO, CT, GA, MD, MN, NM, NY, OR, TN) and additional Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Project (IHSP) states. The IHSP began during the 2009-2010 season to enhance surveillance during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic. IHSP sites included IA, ID, MI, OK and SD during the 2009-2010 season; ID, MI, OH, OK, RI, and UT during the 2010-2011 season; and MI, OH, RI, and UT during the 2011-2012 season. The rates provided are likely to be a vast underestimate of the actual number of influenza-associated hospitalizations. First, the FluSurv-NET is not nationally representative, and second, influenza-associated hospitalizations can be missed, either because testing is not performed, or because cases may be attributed to other causes of pneumonia or other common influenza-related complications. Between October 1, 2011 and March 10, 2012, 737 laboratory-confirmed influenza-associated hospitalizations were reported at a rate of 2.7 per 100,000 population, an increase of 24% from last week. Among cases, 652 (88.5%) were influenza A, 72 (9.8%) were influenza B, and 1 (0.1%) was an influenza A and B co-infection; 12 (1.6%) had no virus type information. Among those with influenza A subtype information, 214 were H3N2 and 80 were 2009 H1N1. The most commonly reported underlying medical conditions among adults were chronic lung diseases, obesity and metabolic disorders. The most commonly reported underlying medical conditions in children were chronic lung diseases, asthma and neurologic disorders. However, half of hospitalized children had no identified underlying medical conditions. ![]() View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation Outpatient Illness Surveillance:Nationwide during week 10, 2.2% of patient visits reported through the U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet) were due to influenza-like illness (ILI). This percentage is below the national baseline of 2.4%. (ILI is defined as fever (temperature of 100°F [37.8°C] or greater) and cough and/or sore throat.) ![]() View National and Regional Level Graphs and Data | View Chart Data | View Full Screen | View PowerPoint Presentation On a regional level, the percentage of outpatient visits for ILI ranged from 0.7% to 3.5% during week 10. Regions 5, 7, and 10 reported a proportion of outpatient visits for ILI above region-specific baseline levels. ILINet State Activity Indicator Map:Data collected in ILINet are used to produce a measure of ILI activity* by state. Activity levels are based on the percent of outpatient visits in a state due to ILI and are compared to the average percent of ILI visits that occur during spring and fall weeks with little or no influenza virus circulation. Activity levels range from minimal, which corresponds to ILI activity being below average, to intense, which corresponds to ILI activity being much higher than average. Because the clinical definition of ILI is very general, not all ILI is caused by influenza; however, when combined with laboratory data, the information on ILI activity provides a clearer picture of influenza activity in the United States. During week 10, the following ILI activity levels were experienced:
Click on map to launch interactive tool *This map uses the proportion of outpatient visits to health care providers for influenza-like illness to measure the ILI activity level within a state. It does not, however, measure the extent of geographic spread of flu within a state. Therefore, outbreaks occurring in a single city could cause the state to display high activity levels. Geographic Spread of Influenza as Assessed by State and Territorial Epidemiologists:The influenza activity reported by state and territorial epidemiologists indicates geographic spread of influenza viruses, but does not measure the intensity of influenza activity. During week 10, the following influenza activity was reported:
Flu Activity data in XML Format | View Full Screen
U.S. State and local influenza surveillance: Click on a jurisdiction below to access the latest local influenza information.
Distribute Project: Additional information on the Distribute syndromic surveillance project, developed and piloted by the International Society for Disease Surveillance (ISDS) now working in collaboration with CDC, to enhance and support Emergency Department (ED) surveillance, is available at http://isdsdistribute.org/ Google Flu Trends: Google Flu Trends uses aggregated Google search data in a model created in collaboration with CDC to estimate influenza activity in the United States. For more information and activity estimates from the U.S. and worldwide, see http://www.google.org/flutrends/ Europe: for the most recent influenza surveillance information from Europe, please see WHO/Europe at http://www.euroflu.org/index.php Public Health Agency of Canada: The most up-to-date influenza information from Canada is available at http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/fluwatch/ World Health Organization FluNet: Additional influenza surveillance information from participating WHO member nations is available at FluNet -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A description of surveillance methods is available at: http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/overview.htm http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/ |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Powered By VIRSystem News |